Skip to content
RepWatchForumSign in

Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me? · RWF-28695

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.

Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.

ClaspCheck 02706Participant

First identify the caliber, lift-angle setting, winding state and measurement position. Without those fields, the rate, amplitude and beat-error values lack enough context for a useful comparison.

Can the same settings and winding state be used for several positions? Record each position separately rather than combining measurements taken under different conditions.

Amplitude depends on the movement and measurement setup. Compare it with appropriate specifications and a qualified watchmaker’s assessment; a universal pass/fail threshold would be misleading.

TimeLog 02709Participant

The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.

DialNotes 02711Participant

A useful table has columns for date, position, winding state, lift angle, rate, amplitude and beat error. Keep the full recording so settings and stability can be checked.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.