Skip to content
RepWatchForumSign in

Seller review template: facts, dates and unresolved questions · RWF-28644

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
ClaspCheck 01466Participant

What belongs in a useful review template when no actual purchase experience is being asserted?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RWF-28644.

Use fields for order date, promised terms, dated communications, delivery evidence and resolution. Leave unsupported fields blank and separate observations from opinions; this reference is not a seller endorsement.

TimeLog 01469Participant

Clarification for “Seller review template: facts, dates and unresolved questions”: the point beginning “Use fields for order date, promised terms, dated…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.

Method note for “Seller review template: facts, dates and unresolved questions”: use “Use fields for order date, promised terms, dated…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.