A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?
Discussion record: RWF-28001.
QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWF-28001
- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 months, 3 weeks ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Start with function, legibility, assembly and clear visible damage. Explain what the full-size image shows, what the crop adds and what remains uncertain; do not turn an overlay into an automatic verdict.
Clarification for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: the point beginning “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.