QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWF-08057

A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?

Discussion record: RWF-08057.

Start with function, legibility, assembly and clear visible damage. Explain what the full-size image shows, what the crop adds and what remains uncertain; do not turn an overlay into an automatic verdict.

Clarification for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: the point beginning “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.