A comparison has been corrected after a new photograph arrived. How should the original thread remain useful?
Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.
Forum comparison archive: link the evidence and the correction · RWF-08027
- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 months, 1 week ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Add a dated correction near the original conclusion and link the new evidence. Preserve the reasoning trail instead of silently replacing an uncertain claim with a confident one.
Clarification for “Forum comparison archive: link the evidence and the correction”: the point beginning “Add a dated correction near the original conclusion…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Method note for “Forum comparison archive: link the evidence and the correction”: use “Add a dated correction near the original conclusion…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.