A nominal case diameter says little about a bracelet that cannot be shortened enough. How should a sizing question be documented?
Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.
Record wrist circumference, removable links and the clasp adjustment range in millimetres. Request the closed bracelet circumference rather than inferring it from marketing dimensions.
Clarification for “Bracelet fit: measuring the usable clasp adjustment”: the point beginning “Record wrist circumference, removable links and the clasp…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Method note for “Bracelet fit: measuring the usable clasp adjustment”: use “Record wrist circumference, removable links and the clasp…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.