A bright line appears in one polished-case image. What additional evidence would distinguish a mark from reflected light?
Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.
Case finishing: distinguish a reflection from a surface mark · RWF-01107
- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 months, 4 weeks ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Ask for photographs with the light moved and retain the same viewing angle. A mark should be assessed across multiple views; aggressive polishing is not an appropriate diagnostic test.
Clarification for “Case finishing: distinguish a reflection from a surface mark”: the point beginning “Ask for photographs with the light moved and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Method note for “Case finishing: distinguish a reflection from a surface mark”: use “Ask for photographs with the light moved and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.